|
|
comments
( 45 )
|
|
|
02/03/09 14:46 #1
Nova Warfighter(Archived)
|
Yes,sure
|
|
02/03/09 14:50 #2
Trex(Archived)
|
no way, ban this crap
|
|
02/03/09 14:53 #3
ciwawa(Archived)
|
this weapon is just unfair
|
|
02/03/09 14:55 #4
Benscho(Archived)
|
yes ! but i cant vote : (
|
|
02/03/09 15:12 #5
 febrik(Archived)
|
sandmanlimit 1 is reasonably
|
|
02/03/09 15:13 #6
Mar(Archived)
|
Stun has no place in a competitive fps game, ban this.
|
|
02/03/09 15:18 #7
T.iN.T.a(Archived)
|
demoman stick charging principle for sandman
|
|
02/03/09 15:21 #8
hänsen(Archived)
|
I do not care, but i am not in the league :p
|
|
02/03/09 15:41 #9
sommie(Archived)
|
Ban it. Please ban this shitty overpowered 'weapon'.
|
|
02/03/09 15:42 #10
Puschen(Archived)
|
this vote is unfair.. every class except the scouts will vote against it!
|
|
02/03/09 15:52 #11
caNdY(Archived)
|
Let the sandman. Thats the game. Heavy can use the natasha so scout too.
|
|
02/03/09 15:53 #12
Shimla(Archived)
|
yes, sure !!!
|
|
02/03/09 15:58 #13
b@sH(Archived)
|
no!!!
|
|
02/03/09 17:07 #14
Mick(Archived)
|
ban it !
|
|
02/03/09 17:19 #15
forcenet(Archived)
|
no, hate that piece of bullcrap
kc Puschen wrote: this vote is unfair.. every class except the scouts will vote against it!
actually a lot of scouts too
|
|
02/03/09 17:21 #16
Mitch(Archived)
|
Yeah ban the Sandman.
|
|
02/03/09 17:41 #17
 leogeo2(Archived)
|
It is a bit of a ridiculous weapon. Those who get hit are almost guaranteed to get destroyed by the enemy team since they can't dodge rockets or grenades coming at them.
|
|
02/03/09 17:46 #18
forcenet(Archived)
|
that's quite crappy by itself and now take into account it can stop ubers.. that's just fubar
|
|
02/03/09 18:15 #19
archy_7 AT(Archived)
|
ban this shitty unlock!
|
|
02/03/09 18:24 #20
bunfi(Archived)
|
i don't want to stop an über. über is über.
|
|
02/03/09 19:05 #21
Orb(Archived)
|
Sandlimit 1 will be fun/fair, let's do some new things ....
You all whiners :p
|
|
02/03/09 19:12 #22
Skelus(Archived)
|
I think that Sandmanlimit 1 its OK
|
|
02/03/09 20:36 #23
dazed(Archived)
|
its overpowered, ban
|
|
02/03/09 21:09 #24
lork(Archived)
|
BAN THIS SHIT!
|
|
02/03/09 21:11 #25
 ghost17(Archived)
|
Since I can't vote via the poll (for whatever reason), I vote via comment 2nd option ("NO! Stay away!").
*EDIT*: Problem solved, you can only vote if your main team is set to the tf2 league team.
|
|
02/03/09 22:41 #26
Tranky(Archived)
|
Ban it! Natacha slowing you but you can still moving (slowly), jumping and the most important thing firing to defend yourself!!!
|
|
03/03/09 01:03 #27
Myth(Archived)
|
No, stay away.
|
|
03/03/09 02:05 #28
Valtiel(Archived)
|
well It could be nerfed before it is allowed but that's a whole another story
|
|
03/03/09 02:52 #29
SpeedMan(Archived)
|
The Sandman it's pretty cool but it's not for a competitive game. The disable of double-jump isn't balanced enough for the stun effect.
Alto it requires a good skill to stun a moving player, uber charges looks so "powerless" with this update.
my vote goes to No.
|
|
03/03/09 06:02 #30
cheetah
ESL Admin Team
(Archived)
|
Maybe Valve will nerf the effect someday, maybe we will have sandmanlimit 1 someday, maybe the winter is over soon :D
gl & hf in ESL TF2 6on6 League Season III probably without Sandman
|
|
03/03/09 12:00 #31
vanHunt(Archived)
|
Quite unequal vote Situation.
I really guess over 90% of the Players would always vote "no" to something new in a class if they have at the beginning situation with this class update some disadvantage or unknown counterstrategys. I really wonder why the Blutsaugher is allowed btw. (Because it is really a "must" need Weapon and not like the Sandman a really choiceable weapon.
I vote "YES" , because i really think that the double-jump is something quite important ability for a scout and in over 95% of the Sitation it does not matter if a scout stunn a person behind him , or just shot him down.
And ok , somethings a scout can kill a medic because the heavy is stunned etc. but.. think about it.. how often does this happen and would not the Medic die in a equal situation versus an other class?
Its mostly crying because some person seems to be killed 1-2 times stunned in a game and feel fooled.
pp:
Most people also cry about the unflexibel gameplay in 6on6 war games. This is something which totally offers new way of strategys and now you really want to dispose it away?
|
|
03/03/09 12:27 #32
b@sH(Archived)
|
yes dispose it
|
|
03/03/09 12:47 #33
Treddy(Archived)
|
just allow this unlock, or maybe limit it to 1. First the aim of sandman isn't as easy like flaregun. Second a scout without double-jump is such a easy traget like a medic or spy.
all in all I agree in vanHunt's Post. The Sandman brings a very new side to the game. So maybe waiting for uber won't be important as it is, cause a single scout can block the medic.
Maybe it should removed, that a scout can pick up a ball from the ground, as a possible update.
But I think the sandman is a very nice and funny idea and it brings a lot of new strategys wihtin it.
|
|
03/03/09 15:27 #34
Laress(Archived)
|
ban this piece of crap.
|
|
03/03/09 15:36 #35
the_kid(Archived)
|
I think only 1 Sandman per team could be fair.
|
|
03/03/09 16:40 #36
caNdY(Archived)
|
O my god.... The game need tha sandman. Why didnt ask the players after heavy and pyro update??
|
|
03/03/09 19:50 #37
Karl0ss(Archived)
|
I can't vote, cuz acutaly i don't play in league but...
BAN Sandmand.
Stun in FPS? Jeez.
|
|
04/03/09 13:13 #38
Achmed(Archived)
|
BAN SANDMAN!!
|
|
04/03/09 15:23 #39
SeReniTy(Archived)
|
no
|
|
04/03/09 23:17 #40
imhanner(Archived)
|
sandman is great!!
|
|
05/03/09 15:34 #41
Rex(Archived)
|
Ban it!!
|
|
06/03/09 12:52 #42
The_Leader(Archived)
|
Allow it, just 1 piece. :)
|
|
07/03/09 22:32 #43
appe(Archived)
|
Ban it, it's stupid and belongs on publics.
|
|
08/03/09 13:32 #44
atreides(Archived)
|
great post vanHunt, not really pointed but it hits the core of the matter exactly.
|
|
08/03/09 13:39 #45
atreides(Archived)
|
Due to disabled edit function, for the minutes: voted for limit 1.
|
|