|
previous   1-25 ]26-50 ]51-75 ]76-100 ]101-125 ]126-150 ]151-175 ]176-200 ]
201-225 ]226-250 ]  next
[Feedback] Critics, opinions, things you want ...
 
Author Posting
8 on 8 cq
quote ] 
8x8 Conquest
quote ] 
8x8 cq
quote ] 
8on8 cq
quote ] 
5on5 - Infantry Only - Conquest
8on8 - Vehicles/Infantry - Conquest
quote ] 
Rules update and maps removal.

OP Fire Storm HAS to be removed and weapon attachement should've been removed also!
quote ] 
Fr0styyy. wrote:
Rules update and maps removal.

OP Fire Storm HAS to be removed and weapon attachement should've been removed also!


I don´t see OP Firestorm as a bad map, IMO every maps is actually perfectly playable at 8on8.
quote ] 
Just read the actual rules in esl 8on8conquest and do NEW rules coz its IMPOSSIBLE to play competitive with 64 maps, 3d spotting or shit like that.

PLZ keep the pressure or we will see the dead of competitive bf3 in esl.
quote ] 
Aekold wrote:
Just read the actual rules in esl 8on8conquest and do NEW rules coz its IMPOSSIBLE to play competitive with 64 maps, 3d spotting or shit like that.

PLZ keep the pressure or we will see the dead of competitive bf3 in esl.




 +34united
quote ] 
AGAIN FAIR PING!!!!!

RULES??
quote ] 
Rules - unlocks restrictions.

Not very enjoyable playing 8 vs 8 were one team uses flashligt only on their weapons. You either join up with your own flashlight or ragequit.
quote ] 
The option "map LARGE" is bullshit .... sorry for this hard words, but you can´t play 8on8 with LARGE maps ... the small maps are engouh, but not the large maps ... to diffuculty to play.
quote ] 
The more players, the better. Why are you playing BF3, which is the incarnation of 64p maps and then use your COD style of play?? Why not 12vs12 = e.g. 2 full (4players) infantry squads, 1 tank+gunner, 1 heli+gunner (or whatsoever) for each team?? It would take clans to the next step in their tactics, game coordinations. Without the possibility to play BF3 with 12+ players in tournaments, it will be just another CS, COD... RUN&GUN in nice new graphics.
quote ] 
Do you need to have an own server? Seems that I can't get a straight answer to that...
quote ] 
5on5 - Infantry Only - Conquest
8on8 or 12on12 - Vehicles/Infantry - Conquest
quote ] 
GOML-Backswag wrote:
Do you need to have an own server? Seems that I can't get a straight answer to that...


yes
quote ] 
8on8 Conquest!
quote ] 
5v5 CQ 
8v8 CQ
quote ] 
5on5 - Infantry Only - Conquest
8on8  - Vehicles/Infantry - Conquest
quote ] 
Taaani wrote:
5on5 - Infantry Only



+1
quote ] 
Does not matter if its 5v5 4v4 8v8 as long as there is proper restrictions to unlocks and vehicels
quote ] 
5on5 - Infantry Only - Conquest
8on8  - Vehicles/Infantry - Conquest

i agree
quote ] 
Dranzer wrote:
8on8 conquest , 4on4 inf

(what use is 5 when he cant be in squad xD)

and for god sake make up some rules for that shit.. dont allow all that unlock crap..

INFs: only unlocks allowed is defi, c4, mines and stinger (works for inf and con.)

Tanks/heli: there should be unlocks like the smoke/flares and mashinegun/TV guided - maybe the proximityradar for both too since they R easy to kill...

Planes: no planes allowed... like in bf2

simple ^^


Caus it actualy require skills to switch squad and take tatical advandge out thought the squad-system.. not like 4v4 where the squads role is as big as the whiny of those who actualy play that shit mode.
quote ] 
5on5 - Infantry Only - NO FBF
quote ] 
5on5 - Inf
quote ] 
previous   51  -  75   next

Reply

 
  • 3.216 Users Online
  • 4.863.170 Registered Users
  • 2.121.280 Active Users
  • 1.032.000 Teams Total
  • 1.994 Matches Yesterday
  • 22.238.500 Matches Total
  • More stats
Searchtags

Electronic Sports League rendertime: 0.92s (not_cached) host: eslphp9